TANTRUMP.org

A factual log of presidential escalations

← Back to entries

Threatened to cut federal funding to California over transgender athletes

November 15, 2025

1
Level

Verbal Deviation

Founders' Principles Violated

Guardrails Violated

Why Level 1?

Threat to cut federal funding to state over policy disagreement violates federalism principles. No concrete action taken, but threat creates uncertainty and undermines federal-state relationships.

What Happened

Context

President Trump threatened on November 15, 2025, to cut federal funding to California after Governor Gavin Newsom defended transgender athletes in women's sports competitions. Trump called it 'deeply unfair' and threatened to stop federal money flow to California.

Action Taken

Threatened on November 15, 2025, to cut federal funding to California after Governor Gavin Newsom defended transgender athletes in women's sports competitions. Trump called it 'deeply unfair' and threatened to stop federal money flow to California. The threat was made during public statements. Critics argued the threat violated federalism principles and exceeded executive authority. The threat created uncertainty for California and raised concerns about federalism. No concrete action was taken, but the threat raised concerns about federal-state relationships.

In His Own Words

"California will lose federal funding if they allow this."

"Transgender athletes in women's sports is deeply unfair."

"We will not fund states that promote this."

What's Wrong

Threat to cut federal funding to state over policy disagreement violates federalism principles and exceeds executive authority. Federal funding is typically authorized by Congress and cannot be arbitrarily cut by executive. The threat was made without proper legal basis. Critics argued the threat violated federalism principles.

Impact

Constitutional: Threat violates federalism principles and exceeds executive authority. Legal: Questions about authority to cut federal funding without Congressional authorization. Operational: Threat created uncertainty for California. Political: Threat raises concerns about federal-state relationships.

Primary Sources