TANTRUMP.org

A factual log of presidential escalations

← Back to entries

Threatened Iran with military intervention for protest suppression

January 13, 2026

4
Level

Systemic Escalation

Founders' Principles Violated

M
Madison

Checks & balances bypassed. Executive action without Congressional authority.
F
Franklin

Threatened allies instead of diplomatic negotiation.
W
Washington

Personal ambition overriding institutional stability.

Guardrails Violated

War Powers Resolution

War Powers Resolution requirements for Congressional notification and authorization bypassed.
Congressional Authority

Congressional authority and oversight bypassed.
Diplomatic Channels

Established diplomatic channels and protocols bypassed.

Why Level 4?

Threats of military intervention against foreign country without Congressional authorization. Multiple guardrails bypassed: War Powers Resolution, Congressional authority, diplomatic channels. Measurable harm to international law and risk of military escalation.

What Happened

Context

President Trump threatened 'very strong action' against Iran on January 13, 2026, if the Iranian regime executed protesters during anti-government protests. The threat implied possible military intervention.

Action Taken

Threatened 'very strong action' against Iran on January 13, 2026, if the Iranian regime executed protesters during anti-government protests. The threat was made during public statements and implied possible military intervention. Trump said the U.S. was 'locked and loaded' and that 'help is on the way' for Iranian protesters. Critics argued the threats violated international law and escalate into military conflict. The threats created uncertainty about U.S. military intervention in Iran.

In His Own Words

"If Iran executes protesters, we will take very strong action."

"We are locked and loaded."

"Help is on the way for Iranian protesters."

What's Wrong

Threats of military intervention against Iran without proper Congressional authorization or diplomatic consultation. Military action against foreign countries requires Congressional authorization under War Powers Resolution. The threats were made without proper process and escalate into military conflict. Critics argued the threats violated international law.

Impact

Diplomatic: Threats of military intervention created uncertainty about U.S. military action in Iran. International: Threats violated international law and raised concerns about military escalation. Legal: Questions about authority to threaten military intervention without Congressional authorization. Operational: Threats created uncertainty about potential military conflict.

Primary Sources